MOOT COURT 

how do you call the court that does mock cases and cases already tried

The type of court you're referring to can have different names depending on its purpose:

Moot Court: This is typically a mock court used for educational purposes, especially in law schools. Students participate in simulated court proceedings to practice and refine their legal skills.

Mock Trial Court: Similar to a moot court, this involves simulated trials to teach participants about court procedures, often used in high schools, universities, or legal training.

Appellate Court: In the context of cases already tried, appellate courts handle the review of decisions made by lower courts to ensure proper application of the law.

Let me know if you meant something else, and we can dive into it!

can u provide video

Unfortunately, I can't provide or play videos directly. However, I can help you find relevant video resources or share guidance on where you might access them. For instance, if you're looking for videos on mock trials or moot courts, platforms like YouTube or educational websites may have helpful content. Let me know if you'd like me to assist in searching for something!

Today

So, what is the appellate court for a General Court Martial case that was tried under a negociation?

In the military justice system, appellate courts for General Court-Martial cases include the Courts of Criminal Appeals (CCA) for each branch of service. For example:

Army Court of Criminal Appeals (ACCA)

Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA)

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (NMCCA)

These courts automatically review cases involving punitive discharges or confinement exceeding two years. If further appeal is needed, the case can be taken to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF), which is composed of civilian judges3.

Negotiated cases may still follow this appellate process, depending on the terms of the plea agreement. Let me know if you'd like more details!

So, what happens when the accused plead guilty under a negociation?

When an accused pleads guilty under a negotiation (commonly part of a plea agreement in court-martial cases), several things typically happen:

Acceptance of Plea: The military judge must first ensure that the accused understands the nature and consequences of the guilty plea. This includes confirming that the plea is voluntary and not coerced. The judge may also review the specifics of the plea agreement.

Pretrial Agreement: Often, plea negotiations involve a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority. This agreement may outline concessions, such as reduced charges or a cap on sentencing, in exchange for the guilty plea.

Providency Inquiry: The military judge conducts a "providency inquiry" to ensure that the accused fully admits to each element of the offenses they are pleading guilty to. If the judge determines the plea is provident (legally sufficient), the trial proceeds.

Sentencing: After the plea is accepted, the case moves to the sentencing phase. The court may consider the terms of the pretrial agreement, but the judge or panel still determines the sentence within the framework of military law.

Appellate Process: Even with a guilty plea, the case may still undergo appellate review, particularly if the sentence includes certain punishments like a dishonorable discharge. The appellate court ensures that the plea agreement and proceedings were conducted properly.

Guilty pleas under negotiation can sometimes lead to lighter sentences, but they also come with the waiver of certain trial rights, like the right to challenge evidence or confront witnesses. Let me know if you’d like me to expand on any of these points!

Okay so, what happens after conviction, can teh accused now convict can appeal a Brady Violation?

Yes, an accused can appeal a conviction based on a Brady violation, even after the conviction. A Brady violation occurs when the prosecution fails to disclose evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the outcome of the case. Here's what typically happens:

Post-Conviction Appeals: The accused can file an appeal or a motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that the Brady violation undermined the fairness of the trial. Courts will review whether the suppressed evidence was material and whether its absence affected the verdict.

Materiality Standard: For the appeal to succeed, the accused must demonstrate that the suppressed evidence was material, meaning there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.

Remedies: If the court finds a Brady violation, it may overturn the conviction, order a new trial, or take other corrective actions to ensure justice.

Brady violations are taken seriously because they violate the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial. Let me know if you'd like to explore this further!